Precinct Boundary Review Process

• Mapping or survey anomaly: the submission should show where land has been incorrectly included within Precinct due to a mapping or survey anomaly
• The orderly and efficient delivery of land to market: the submission should meet the overall objective of getting land to market with the best use of Government resources 
• Service and drainage catchments: the submission should show that land will be able to be serviced by existing or planned infrastructure
• Logical urban catchments: the submission should show the boundary creates a logical urban catchment by following a physical boundary such as a major creek, ridge line or regional transport line such as an arterial road or rail line
• Integrated land use and transport: the submission should show that the land will be better linked to, for example, the public transport, walking or cycling links to a centre 
• Cadastral boundaries: the submission should show that the boundary better fits cadastral boundaries to avoid ongoing administrative problems 
• Net public benefit: the submission, if not meeting the above criteria, should show there would be an overall benefit to the public if the boundary is changed

Submissions must satisfy at least one of the Assessment Criteria without having a negative impact on any other criteria.

A Review Panel evaluates written submissions and prepares a formal recommendation to the Director-General of the Department of Planning & Infrastructure. The Process is not intended to consider major changes to the external Growth Centre boundary.